Governance, risk & compliance architecture

We help firms build governance, risk and compliance frameworks that define accountability and strengthen oversight, from board and committee structures to risk management systems, compliance programmes and internal controls built into day-to-day operations.

Governance should do more than satisfy the rulebook. It should improve decision-making: clear mandates, real escalation paths and controls that people actually operate.

Talk to us
What’s included

Where we help

Board & committee structures

Board charters, terms of reference, composition, quorum and reporting lines for board, audit and risk committees.

Accountability & delegation

Delegation of authority, controlled functions and documented individual accountability.

Risk management systems

Risk appetite, taxonomy, registers and a rating methodology tied to real decisions.

Internal controls

Control design, ownership and testing built into day-to-day operational processes.

Compliance frameworks & monitoring

Compliance manuals, regulatory obligations registers and risk-based compliance monitoring programmes that show the board where the business stands.

Policies & SOPs

Policy frameworks, operating procedures and internal control documentation written for the way your business runs.

Outsourcing & third-party risk

Outsourcing registers, service-level oversight and third-party due diligence.

Fraud risk frameworks

Fraud risk assessment, prevention and detection controls, and response plans.

Governance MI & reporting

Board packs and dashboards that surface exposure, breaches and trends, not noise.

Three lines of defence

Clear separation of business, risk and compliance, and internal audit responsibilities.

Four layers that hold together

01

Oversight

Board and committee mandates, meeting cadence and decision rights.

02

Risk

Appetite statements, registers and escalation thresholds that trigger action.

03

Control

Preventive and detective controls mapped to each material risk and process.

04

Assurance

Independent testing, issue tracking and remediation to closure.

How we engage

01

Assess

Review current governance, risk and control maturity against your obligations.

02

Architect

Design the structures, mandates, appetite and control set as one framework.

03

Embed

Roll out with training, ownership and a working reporting calendar.

04

Assure

Test operating effectiveness and remediate gaps before the regulator finds them.

Who this is for

Regulated financial firms, virtual asset businesses, DNFBPs, family offices and growing companies preparing for licensing, investment or their first regulatory inspection.

Why teams choose RegLex

Accountability that is documented, not assumed
Risk appetite linked to thresholds that actually trigger escalation
Controls built into process, not bolted on afterwards
Board reporting that supports better decisions
Frameworks defensible under DFSA, FSRA, CBUAE, CMA, VARA and Ministry of Economy and Tourism review
Faq

Common questions

What does a regulator look for in governance?

Clear accountability, a board that challenges management and can show it in its minutes, a documented risk appetite, and controls that operate as described. Regulators increasingly test whether governance works in practice, not just on paper.

What is a risk appetite statement?

A board-approved statement of how much risk the business is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives, with measurable limits and escalation triggers.

Do smaller firms need board committees?

Not always. The right structure depends on your size, complexity and licence category. We design governance that is proportionate to your firm and meets your regulator’s expectations without unnecessary layers.

Explore more Regulatory & Supervisory Advisory Independent AML Audits & Health Checks Training & Compliance Culture IFRS Advisory

Oversight that earns its keep.

Let’s build governance that satisfies the regulator and sharpens your decisions.

Book a consult